4.5 Article

In vivo demonstration of the absorptive function of the middle ear epithelium

期刊

HEARING RESEARCH
卷 210, 期 1-2, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.04.011

关键词

absorptive function; sodium flux; middle ear epithelium; in vivo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study investigated in vivo fluid and ion transport across the middle ear epithelium. The tympanic membrane of rats was punctured under general anesthesia. A capillary tube was fitted to the external auditory canal and the bulla filled with various solutions. Middle ear (ME) fluid volume variations were then measured at constant pressure. When saline was used, a linear decrease of fluid volume was apparent. Replacement of sodium with a non-permeable cation (N-methyl-D-glucamin) reduced the absorption rate from 0.065 +/- 0.008 to 0.019 +/- 0.003 mu l/min (P < 0.05, n = 6). Similarly, amiloride (10(-3) M), a sodium channel antagonist, reduced the absorption rate to 0.027 +/- 0.006 mu l/min (P < 0.05, n = 6). Net absorption was abolished when chloride was substituted with gluconate: -0.008 +/- 0.004 mu l/min (P < 0.02, n = 6), which might have been related (i) to the role of chloride as a diffusible anion through the paracellular pathway, or (ii) to the secretion of chloride through apical channels. However in this condition, 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid, a chloride channel blocker, did not affect the rate of fluid exchange -0.008 +/- 0.007 mu l/min (P = 0.75, n = 6). This model provides the first in vivo evidence for the absorptive function of the ME. Fluid introduced into the ME cavity disappears due to active transport through the mucosa. This process is sodium-dependent and can be hindered by high concentration of amiloride. The rate of absorption is high enough to allow total clearance of fluid from the cavity of the middle ear within 13 h. This process might play a role in the maintaining a fluid-free and gas-filled middle ear cavity. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据