4.7 Article

Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters

期刊

CRITICAL CARE
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 R631-R635

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/cc3824

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Central venous catheterization is commonly used in critically ill patients and may cause different complications, including infection. Although there are many studies about CVC-related infection, very few have analyzed it in detail. The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence of catheter-related local infection (CRLI) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) with central venous catheters (CVCs) according to different access sites. Methods This is a prospective and observational study, conducted in a 24-bed medical surgical intensive care unit of a 650-bed university hospital. All consecutive patients admitted to the ICU during 3 years ( 1 May 2000 and 30 April 2003) were included. Results The study included 2,018 patients. The number of CVCs and days of catheterization duration were: global, 2,595 and 18,999; subclavian, 917 and 8,239; jugular, 1,390 and 8,361; femoral, 288 and 2,399. CRLI incidence density was statistically higher for femoral than for jugular ( 15.83 versus 7.65, p < 0.001) and subclavian ( 15.83 versus 1.57, p < 0.001) accesses, and higher for jugular than for subclavian access ( 7.65 versus 1.57, p < 0.001). CRBSI incidence density was statistically higher for femoral than for jugular (8.34 versus 2.99, p = 0.002) and subclavian ( 8.34 versus 0.97, p < 0.001) accesses, and higher for jugular than for subclavian access ( 2.99 versus 0.97, p = 0.005). Conclusion Our results suggest that the order for punction, to minimize the CVC-related infection risk, should be subclavian ( first order), jugular ( second order) and femoral vein ( third order).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据