4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The 50-50 criteria on postoperative day 5 - An accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGERY
卷 242, 期 6, 页码 824-829

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000189131.90876.9e

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To standardize the definition of postoperative liver failure (PLF) for prediction of early mortality after hepatectomy. Summary Background Data: The definition of PLF is not standardized, making the comparison of innovations in surgical techniques and the timely use of specific therapeutic interventions complex. Methods: Between 1998 and 2002, 775 elective liver resections, including 69% for malignancies and 60% major resections, were included in a prospective database. The nontumorous liver was abnormal in 43% with steatosis > 30% in 14%, noncirrhotic fibrosis in 43%, and cirrhosis in 12%. The impact of prothrombin time (PT) < 50% and serum bilirubin (SB) > 50 mu mol/L on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 5, and 7 was analyzed. Results: The lowest PT level was observed on postoperative day (POD) 1, while the peak of SB was observed on POD 3. These 2 variables tended to return to preoperative values by POD 5. The median interval between hepatectomy and postoperative death was 15 days (range, 5-39 days). Postoperative mortality significantly increased in patients with PT < 50% and SB > 50 mu ml/L. The conjunction of PT < 50% and SB > 50 mu mol/L on POD 5 was a. strong predictive factor of mortality. In patients with significant morbidity, this 50-50 criteria was met 3 to 8 days before clinical evidence of complications. Conclusions: The association of PT < 50% and SB > 50 mu mol/L on POD 5 (the 50-50 criteria) was a simple, early, and accurate predictor of more than 50% mortality rate after hepatectomy. This criteria could be identified early enough, before clinical evidence of complications, for specific interventions to be applied in due time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据