4.7 Article

Malnutrition determined by the patient-gene rated subjective global assessment is associated with poor outcomes in acute stroke patients

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 1073-1077

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.08.010

关键词

malnutrition; stroke; outcomes; nutrition status; scored PG-SGA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Et aims: The extent of malnutrition in hospitalised stroke patients and its influence on outcomes including hospital complications, length of stay and discharge destination are important issues. The aim of this study was to determine the nutritional status of patients admitted to an acute stroke unit and the association between nutritional status and health outcomes. Methods: Nutritional status was determined prospectively using the scored patient generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) in patients In = 73) admitted to an acute stroke unit within 48 h of admission to an Australian private hospital. Outcome data were collected by retrospective audit. Results: On admission, 19.2% of patients were malnourished and this was associated with a significantly greater PG-SGA score (15 vs. 5) and tower body weight (59.8 kg vs. 75.8 kg) compared to well-nourished patients. In terms of health outcomes, malnourished patients had longer length of stay (13 vs. 8 days), increased complications (50% vs. 14%), increased frequency of dysphagia (71% vs. 32%) and enteral feeding (93% vs. 59%). No association was found between nutritional status and serum albumin level or discharge destination. Conclusions: Malnutrition on admission to hospital after acute stroke is associated with poor outcomes including increased length of stay and increased prevalence of dysphagia and complications. The scored PG-SGA is a nutrition assessment toot that allows quick identification of malnourished stroke patients. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据