4.5 Article

The effect of adult day care services on time to nursing home placement in older adults with Alzheimer's disease

期刊

GERONTOLOGIST
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 754-763

出版社

GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY AMER
DOI: 10.1093/geront/45.6.754

关键词

community-based services; institutionalization; longitudinal study; survival analysis

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG09966, R01 AG10315] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This longitudinal study examined whether the use of adult day care services delayed time to nursing home placement. in persons with Alzheimer's disease. Design and Methods: Two hundred and eighteen adult day care clients with Alzheimer's disease were recruited from 16 adult day programs in a large metropolitan area. Two hundred and ninety eight persons with Alzheimer's disease but not using adult day care were recruited from a federally funded Alzheimer's diagnostic center and frequency matched to adult day care users on age, gender, race, and level of cognitive impairment. Participants were followed at 3-month intervals for up to 48 months. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the effects of adult day care and other fixed and time-varying factors on risk of nursing home placement. Results: Risk of nursing home placement increased significantly with the number of days of adult day care attendance, with this effect being substantially greater for men (hazard ratio or HR = 1.33; confidence interval or Cl = 1.18-1.49) than for women (HR = 1.09; Cl = 1.00-1.18). Participant disability and hospitalizations and caregiver age and burden were independent predictors, but their inclusion in the model did not alter the risk associated with adult day care. Implications: More severe disease and greater caregiver burden did not explain the increased risk of nursing home placement among adult day care users with Alzheimer's disease. Rather, it appears that other unmeasured factors, such as a proclivity to institutionalize, may account for the association of adult day care to nursing home risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据