4.5 Article

Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 650-656

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01170.x

关键词

Cbfa1; dental implants; differentiation; osteoblasts; titanium surface

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE14269, DE13076] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The promotion of osteoblast attachment and differentiation has been evaluated on various implant surfaces. However, the effects of different implant surface properties on gene expression of key osteogenic factors are not fully understood. Objective: The objectives of this study were to evaluate how topographical effects on titanium surface alter the expression of bone-related genes and transcription factors. Methods: Osteoblasts were cultured on titanium disks prepared with a titanium dioxide grit blasting (TiOBlast (TM)) or grit blasted and etched with hydrofluoric acid (Osseospeed (TM)), grit blasted and etched (SLA-1), or grit blasted, etched and rinsed with N-2 protection and stored in isotonic NaCl (SLA-2) commercially pure titanium implant discs. High-density cultures of human mesenchymal pre-osteoblastic cells (HEPM 1486, ATCC) were grown for 72 h and real-time PCR used for quantitative analysis of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), core-binding factor alpha 1 (Cbfa1), Osterix, Type I Collagen, Osteocalcin and bone sialoprotein II gene expression. Results: Real-time PCR showed significant (P < 0.001) increases in ALP gene expression in osteoblasts grown on SLA-2, relative to all other surfaces. Cbfa1/RUNX-2 gene expression was significantly (P < 0.01) increased on Osseospeed and TiOBlast surface as compared with SLA-1 and SLA-2 surfaces. The expression of Osterix had a trend similar to that of Cbfa1. Conclusion: In conclusion, implant surface properties may contribute to the regulation of osteoblast differentiation by influencing the level of bone-related genes and transcription factors in human mesenchymal pre-osteoblastic cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据