4.7 Article

The 12C/13C isotope gradient derived from millimeter transitions of CN:: The case for galactic chemical evolution

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 634, 期 2, 页码 1126-1132

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/497123

关键词

astrochemistry; Galaxy : evolution; ISM : abundances; ISM : clouds; radio lines : ISM; stars : AGB and post-AGB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New measurements of C-12/C-13 ratios in Galactic molecular clouds have been conducted using the N = 1 -> 0 transition of the CN radical. This species is unique in that it has extensive hyperfine structure that can be accurately used to correct for line saturation effects. Combined with the past observations of Savage and coworkers, the ratios derived from CN are the most extensive data set to date for molecular clouds, and they include sources that lie in the range of 0.09 - 16.41 kpc in distance from the Galactic center (D-GC). The ratios derived from CN indicate a gradient with Galactic distance of C-12/C-13 6.01 D-GC + 12.28. This gradient agrees rather closely with those derived from measurements of CO and H2CO. The least-squares fit to all data points for the three molecules is C-12/C-13 6.21D(GC) + 18.71. CO, CN, and H2CO are synthesized from quite varied reactions, and any C-13 fractionation must follow different pathways for these three species. The relatively good agreement between the C-12/C-13 ratios of the three molecules, as well as their lack of correlation with gas kinetic temperature, suggests that chemical fractionation and isotope-selective photodissociation both do not play a substantial role in influencing such ratios. Therefore, the C-12/C-13 gradient found in the Galaxy is a true indicator of Galactic chemical evolution. The apparent discrepancy between the solar system (C-12/C-13 89) and local interstellar medium values (C-12/C-13 approximate to 68) of this ratio may be a result of C-13 enrichment since the formation of the solar system, as predicted by recent models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据