4.3 Article

Measuring carbon isotope ratios of microphytobenthos using compound-specific stable isotope analysis of phytol

期刊

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 511-519

出版社

AMER SOC LIMNOLOGY OCEANOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2005.3.511

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon stable isotope analysis is one of the most common methods for validating theories about the role microphytobenthos (MPB) plays in estuarine food webs. However, difficulties extracting MPB from sediments to determine a pure isotope signature have hampered such studies. We have developed compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) of phytol delta C-13 (delta C-13(phytol)) as an accurate proxy for delta C-13 of bulk MPB (delta C-13(bulk)). In most circumstances MPB is the dominant source of phytol in estuarine sediments, particularly in shallow water environments, so our method circumvents the need to extract MPB. We have demonstrated in the laboratory the relationship between delta C-13(phytol) and delta C-13(bulk), and could predict delta C-13(bulk) within 1.8% (95% CI) of observed values at moderate replication (n = 5). If water temperature is included, delta C-13(phytol) predicts delta C-13(bulk) within 1.3%. With greater replication (n = 10), predictions are extremely good (within 1.0%). A two-source mixing model assessed the usefulness of each method for estimating MPB contribution to consumer nutrition. At moderate replication (n = 5), for a gap between MPB and another producer of 6.0%, estimates were more precise (i.e., 95% CIs were smaller) when both delta C-13(phytol) and temperature were used (95% CI 0.40) rather than only delta C-13(phytol) (0.46). The greatest difference in precision was for a gap of 6.0%, close to the average gap in the literature (5.5%). Given the difficulty of extracting MPB from sediment, carbon isotope studies of food webs could benefit by using CSIA of phytol, especially in conjunction with simple measurements of water temperature. The advance in methodology will allow a reevaluation of the trophic importance of MPB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据