4.5 Article

Minimizing center of mass vertical movement increases metabolic cost in walking

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 99, 期 6, 页码 2099-2107

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00103.2005

关键词

biomechanics; determinants of gait; inverted pendulum; locomotion; mechanical work

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-00279] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A human walker vaults up and over each stance limb like an inverted pendulum. This similarity suggests that the vertical motion of a walker's center of mass reduces metabolic cost by providing a mechanism for pendulum-like mechanical energy exchange. Alternatively, some researchers have hypothesized that minimizing vertical movements of the center of mass during walking minimizes the metabolic cost, and this view remains prevalent in clinical gait analysis. We examined the relationship between vertical movement and metabolic cost by having human subjects walk normally and with minimal center of mass vertical movement (flat-trajectory walking). In flat-trajectory walking, subjects reduced center of mass vertical displacement by an average of 69% (P = 0.0001) but consumed approximately twice as much metabolic energy over a range of speeds (0.7 - 1.8 m/s) (P = 0.0001). In flat-trajectory walking, passive pendulum-like mechanical energy exchange provided only a small portion of the energy required to accelerate the center of mass because gravitational potential energy fluctuated minimally. Thus, despite the smaller vertical movements in flat-trajectory walking, the net external mechanical work needed to move the center of mass was similar in both types of walking (P = 0.73). Subjects walked with more flexed stance limbs in flat-trajectory walking (P < 0.001), and the resultant increase in stance limb force generation likely helped cause the doubling in metabolic cost compared with normal walking. Regardless of the cause, these findings clearly demonstrate that human walkers consume substantially more metabolic energy when they minimize vertical motion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据