4.5 Review

Review of assessment and treatment of PTSD among elderly American armed forces veterans

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 20, 期 12, 页码 1118-1130

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.1408

关键词

elderly; veterans; PTSD; review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The number of elderly combat veterans is steadily increasing in the US and estimates project that a notable percentage of these veterans experience symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Limited data exist specifically related to prevalence, assessment, and treatment of PTSD among the elderly veteran population. Objective This review summarizes the available research related to difficulties in assessment with the elderly American Armed Forces veteran population. In addition, both psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatment interventions for PTSD are discussed. Methods A literature search was conducted using PsycINFO, Medline, and the National Center for PTSD's PILOTS database. Results Evidence suggests that elderly veterans generally present more somatic symptoms of PTSD. Medical and psychological comorbodities, such as depression, substance abuse, or cognitive deficits can further complicate the assessment process. Cut-scores for existing instruments need to be further established with elderly veterans. Use of exposure therapies with the elderly has not been adequately researched and mixed results have been obtained for supportive therapy for treatment of PTSD. Controlled research investigating pharmacological interventions for PTSD with the elderly is also limited. Conclusion Evidence suggests that some psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions already utilized with younger individuals may be useful with the elderly veteran population. However, research indicates that modifications may be required for working with the elderly population and further research in the areas of assessment and treatment are necessary. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据