4.7 Article

Unsteady MHD free convective flow past a permeable stretching vertical surface in a nano-fluid

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 136-145

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.08.009

关键词

Unsteady boundary-layer; Vertical surface; Nano-fluid; MHD flow; Buoyancy effect; Vertical surface

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we investigate the transient MHD laminar free convection flow of nano-fluid past a vertical surface. The vertical surface is considered porous and stretched under acceleration. Four different types of water based nano-fluid are considered in this investigation where copper (Cu), copper oxide (CuO), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and titanium dioxide (TiO2) are the nano-particles. The boundary-layer forms of the governing partial differential equations (momentum and energy equations) are transformed into highly nonlinear coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) using similarity technique. The ordinary differential equations are solved numerically using a fourth order Runge-Kutta method based shooting technique. For some special cases, an excellent agreement is observed between the current results and the results available in the existing literature. The effects of different parameters: the nanoparticle volume fraction (phi), unsteadiness parameter (lambda), magnetic parameter (M), buoyancy parameter (A), suction parameter (f(w)) and different types of nanoparticles on the fluid velocity component (f'(eta)), temperature distribution (theta(eta)), the skin friction coefficient (C-f Re-x(1/2)), and the local Nusselt number (Nu(x) Re-x(-1/2)) are presented graphically and discussed in details. The results illustrate that selecting Al2O3 and Cu as the nanoparticle leads to the minimum and maximum amounts of skin friction coefficient absolute value, and also Cu and TiO2 nanoparticles have the largest and lowest local Nusselt number. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据