4.7 Article

Mechanism and effect of thrombospondin-4 polymorphisms on neutrophil function

期刊

BLOOD
卷 106, 期 12, 页码 3970-3978

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1292

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P50 HL-077107, R01 HL 66197] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [K01DK62128] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-throughput genomic technology identified an association between a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), a proline (P387) rather than the predominant alanine (A387) at position 387 in thrombospondin-4 (TSP-4) and premature myocardial infarction. The inflammatory hypothesis of atherosclerosis invokes a prominent role of leukocytes and cytokines in pathogenesis. As the expression 1 of TSP-4 by vascular cells permits its exposure to circulating leukocytes, the interactions of human neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocytes [PMNs]) with both TSP-4 variants were investigated. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)stimulated PMNs adhered and migrated well and equally on the TSP-4 variants. Integrin alpha(M)beta(2) was identified as the TSP-4 receptor mediating these responses, and the 3 epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains of TSP-4 harboring the SNPs interacted with the alpha(M)l-domain. Despite the similarity in these responses, the P387 variant induced more robust tyrosine phosphorylation of the stress-related mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs): p38MAPK and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JINK), as well as signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT1) and heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) than the A387 variant. Additionally, cells adherent to P387 TSP-4 variant released 4-fold more H2O2 and secreted 2-fold more interleukin 8 (IL-8) as compared with the A387. H2O2 release and p38MAPK activation were totally inhibited by blockade Of alpha O-M(2). Thus, alpha O-M(2) plays a central role in proinflammatory activities of TSP-4 (13387) and may contribute to the prothrombotic phenotype associated with this variant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据