4.6 Article

Plasma C-reactive protein in early pregnancy and preterm delivery

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 162, 期 11, 页码 1108-1113

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi323

关键词

biological markers; C-reactive protein; case-control studies; pregnancy; premature birth

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K24 HL068041-03, K24 HL068041, HL68041] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD34568, R01 HD034568, R01 HD034568-03, R37 HD034568] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE14004, R03 DE014004] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic maternal infections have been associated with preterm delivery. The authors examined the association of C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of inflammation, with preterm delivery. This nested case-control study was conducted within Project Viva in Massachusetts between 1999 and 2002. Subjects were 117 women who delivered preterm (< 37 weeks' gestation) and 117 controls (term deliveries) matched on age, race/ethnicity, and smoking status. High-sensitivity CRP assays were performed on early-pregnancy (5.3-19.3 weeks' gestation) plasma samples. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by using conditional logistic regression adjusted for matching factors, gestational age at blood collection, and prepregnancy body mass index. Median concentration of CRP was 3.2 mg/liter in cases versus 2.4 mg/liter in controls. No significant association was found between quartiles of CRP and preterm delivery. However, CRP levels exceeding the threshold defined in the literature were associated with increased risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio = 2.55, 95% confidence interval: 1.05, 6.02 for CRP >= 8 mg/liter). The association was stronger among cases who experienced spontaneous delivery (odds ratio = 4.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.94, 22.96) versus indicated delivery (odds ratio = 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.44, 4.61). These findings suggest that very high CRP levels in early pregnancy are associated with preterm delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据