4.6 Article

Evolution of superconductivity in electron-doped cuprates: Magneto-Raman spectroscopy

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 72, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.214510

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electron-doped cuprates Pr2-xCexCuO4-delta and Nd2-xCexCuO4-delta have been studied by electronic Raman spectroscopy across the entire region of the superconducting (SC) phase diagram. The SC pairing strength is found to be consistent with a weak-coupling regime except in the underdoped region where we observe an in-gap collective mode at 4.5k(B)T(c) while the maximum amplitude of the SC gap is approximate to 8k(B)T(c). In the normal state, doped carriers divide into coherent quasiparticles (QPs) and carriers that remain incoherent. The coherent QPs mainly reside in the vicinity of (+/-pi/2a, +/-pi/2a) regions of the Brillouin zone (BZ). We find that only coherent QPs contribute to the superfluid density in the B-2g channel. The persistence of SC coherence peaks in the B-2g channel for all dopings implies that superconductivity is mainly governed by interactions between the holelike coherent QPs in the vicinity of (+/-pi/2a, +/-pi/2a) regions of the BZ. We establish that superconductivity in the electron-doped cuprates occurs primarily due to pairing and condensation of holelike carriers. We have also studied the excitations across the SC gap by Raman spectroscopy as a function of temperature (T) and magnetic field (H) for several different cerium dopings (x). Effective upper critical field lines H-c2(*)(T,x) at which the superfluid stiffness vanishes and H-c2(2 Delta)(T,x) at which the SC gap amplitude is suppressed by fields have been determined; H-c2(2 Delta)(T,x) is larger than H-c2(*)(T,x) for all doping concentrations. The difference between the two quantities suggests the presence of phase fluctuations that increase for x less than or similar to 0.15. It is found that the magnetic field suppresses the magnitude of the SC gap linearly at surprisingly small fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据