4.4 Review

The peptidomics concept

期刊

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/138620705774962418

关键词

peptidomics; proteomics; biomarker; mass spectrometry; proteases; drug development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peptides are a paramount example of how nature diversifies from one single gene to release multiple, regulated functionalities at the desired sites and time. To achieve this, peptides are sequentially generated by a complex network or more than 500 proteases, acting at intracellular sites, upon secretion, in extracellular environments, and, finally, serving (regulated) degradation. This cycle of maturation, activation, and degradation points out that the peptidome is mechanistically linked to the proteome: the distribution between both is regulated by proteases and counter-regulated by protease inhibitors. Given the high diversity of peptides in living systems and their involvement in key regulatory processes, a need for improved peptide discovery, ideally combining peptide sequence identification with peptide profiling, has emerged. Standard proteomic approaches are not suitable for a systematic peptide analysis, since they do not cover the low molecular mass window. The new direction in proteomic research to analyse this terra incognita is peptidomics. This novel concept aims at the comprehensive visualization and analysis of small polypeptides, thus covering the mass range between proteomics and metabonomics. The pacemakers for the development of peptidomics technologies are modern mass spectrometry and bioinformatics. They are ideally suited for sensitive and comprehensive peptide analysis, especially in combination with the massive information content of todays genomic and transcriptomic databases. Given the high diversity of native peptides in living systems, clinical chemistry and modern medicine are the prime application areas. The discovery of relevant peptide biomarkers and drug targets will strongly benefit from peptidomics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据