4.7 Article

Estimation of plasma IC50 of donepezil hydrochloride for brain acetylcholinesterase inhibition in monkey using N-[11C]methylpiperidin-4-yl acetate ([11C]MP4A) and PET

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 2154-2161

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300759

关键词

acetylcholinesterase; Alzheimer's disease; in vivo IC50; N-[C-11]methylpiperidin-4-yl acetate ([C-11]MP4A); positron emission; tomography (PET); donepezil hydrochloride

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Donepezil hydrochloride is a potent and selective inhibitor for brain acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and is currently used worldwide for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Until now, there is no in vivo study on the relation between the plasma concentration and the brain AChE inhibition. The purpose of this study was to estimate in vivo plasma IC50 of donepezil in living monkeys by measuring plasma donepezil concentration (LC/MS/MS) and brain AChE activity with positron emission tomography (PET) and N-[C-11]methylpiperidin-4-yl acetate, which is an acetylcholine analog recently developed by us for quantifying in vivo brain AChE activity. PET scans with donepezil at two doses, 100 mu g/kg (donepezil-1; N=5) or 250 mg/kg (donepezil-2; N=5), were performed using the same monkeys at 4-week intervals. Before each PET scan, baseline PET scans (N=10 in total) were performed without donepezil. The plasma donepezil concentrations 14 min after intravenous injection were proportional to the doses, 17.2 +/- 2.9 ng/ml (donepezil-1) and 44.0 +/- 5.0 ng/ml (donepezil-2), and the mean AChE inhibitions in four neocortical regions as evaluated by PET were also dose-dependent, 27% (donepezil-1) and 53% (donepezil-2). In IC50 estimation, measured plasma donepezil concentrations were corrected for the change during PET scan. The IC50 values (estimate +/- SE) were 42 +/- 9.0 (ng/ml; donepezil-1), 34 +/- 3.2 (donepezil- 2), and 37 +/- 4.1 (combined data). The present method may be useful for in vivo evaluation of other AChE inhibitors and novel drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据