4.6 Article

Effects of ketamine and propofol on inflammatory responses of primary glial cell cultures stimulated with lipopolysaccharide

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 803-810

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei256

关键词

anaesthetics i.v., ketamine; anaesthetics i.v., propofol; immune response; pharmacology, ketamine; pharmacology, propofol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Ketamine has been reported to exert anti-inflammatory effects on macrophages stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vitro and in vivo. Several studies have reported conflicting results regarding the effects of propofol on cytokine production from immune cells. However, there have been no reports of the effects of these agents on inflammatory responses in glial cells. We investigated the effects of ketamine and propofol on LPS-induced production of nitric oxide, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) from primary cultures of rat glial cells in vitro. Methods. Glial cells were stimulated with LPS in the absence and presence of various concentrations of ketamine (30-1000 mu M) or propofol (30 and 300 mu M). Nitric oxide released into the culture media was determined by measuring nitrite using the Griess reaction, and concentrations of TNF-alpha and PGE(2) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results. Ketamine reduced LPS-induced TNF-alpha production without significant inhibition of nitrite release in mixed glial cells, astrocyte cultures and microglial cultures. Ketamine also inhibited LPS-induced production of PGE(2) in astrocyte cultures. In contrast, propofol had no effect on LPS-induced nitrite or TNF-alpha production in mixed glial cells. Conclusions. The data demonstrate that ketamine inhibited some of the inflammatory responses of both astrocytes and microglial cells treated with LPS without causing major change in nitric oxide release. Propofol had no effect on the production of nitric oxide or TNF-alpha from LPS-stimulated glial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据