4.6 Article

Comparison of Three Measurements on Computed Tomography for the Prediction of Less Invasiveness in Patients With Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 1878-1884

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.022

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. A greater proportion of ground-glass opacity (GGO) is well known to be strongly associated with less invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Recently, the solid area diameter has also been reported to be a simple and better marker for the same purpose compared with the whole nodule diameter. Methods. From 1997 to 2009, 383 patients with clinical T1-2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a solid area of 3 cm or less underwent surgical resection, and their preoperative high-resolution computed tomographic images were preserved in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format. Less invasive lung cancer was defined as having no vascular, lymphatic, or pleural invasion or lymph node metastasis. We compared the solid area and whole nodule diameters and proportion of GGO, with the objective of predicting less invasive lung cancer. Results. Among the 383 patients, 187 were men, 335 had adenocarcinoma histologic type, 242 had less invasive lung characteristic (ROC) analysis to predict less invasive lung cancer showed that the area under the curve of proportion of GGO was the highest (0.848; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.810-0.886), followed by the solid area diameter (0.785; 95% CI, 0.740-0.829), and then whole nodule diameter (0.621; 95% CI, 0.565-0.677). Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that proportion of GGO was the only significant predictor of less invasive lung cancer. The proportion of GGO was also found to be a significant prognostic factor of disease-free survival (DFS) along with solid area diameter by multivariate analysis. Regardless of the solid area diameter, no patient with a greater proportion of GGO (> 50%) experienced recurrence. Conclusions. Proportion of GGO remains important (C) 2013 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据