4.1 Article

Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of caffeine administered in chewing gum to normal healthy volunteers

期刊

BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 403-409

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdd.469

关键词

caffeine chewing gum; caffeine multiple dose; pharmacokinetics; buccal absorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of three doses of caffeine administered as Stay Alert(R) chewing gum in a multiple dose regimen. Methods: A double-blind, parallel randomized, four-treatment study design was employed. The treatment groups were: 50, 100 and 200 mg caffeine and placebo. Subjects were 48 (n = 12 per group), healthy, non-smoking, males and females who had abstained from caffeine ingestion for at least 20 h prior to dosing, who were randomly assigned to the treatment groups. Caffeine was administered at 2400, 0200 and 0400 h depending on the treatment group. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 and 105 min after each caffeine dose. Samples were also collected at 7.5, 8.5 and 18 h after the last dose of caffeine. Plasma caffeine levels were analysed by a validated UV-HPLC method. Result: The mean T-max after the third dosing ranged from 0.37 to 1.12 h. C-max for 50, 100 and 200 mg was 2.69, 3.45 and 6.33 mg/l, respectively AUC(inf) for 50, 100 and 200 mg group was 33.2, 46.94 and 86.94 mg/l * h, respectively. AUC(inf) values suggested a dose proportionate increase. Dose normalized C-max and AUC(o-tau) values across doses were not significantly different, suggesting linearity was maintained after multiple doses of the Stay Alert(R) chewing gum. There were no group related differences in elimination. Conclusions: The results suggest that caffeine administered in the gum formulation (Stay Alert(R) chewing gum) via a multiple dosing regimen provides an effective and convenient means of maintaining effective concentrations of caffeine that would in some operational scenarios be desirable for maintaining alertness and performance in sleep deprived individuals. Copyright (C) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据