4.6 Article

Coronary Revascularization in Diabetic Patients: Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Surgery

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 96, 期 2, 页码 528-534

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.063

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a well-established procedure for treating diabetic patients with multivessel disease, but extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegia-induced cardiac arrest introduce a severe burden to these patients. The present study investigated if off-pump CABG decreases 30-day mortality and mid-term mortality in diabetic patients in comparison with conventional CABG. Methods. From February 2009 through October 2011, data from 355 consecutive adult diabetic patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 502 patients undergoing on-pump CABG were prospectively recorded. Data analysis was performed by propensity score (PS)-adjusted logistic regression analysis and PS-adjusted Cox regression analysis. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were major complications and mortality on follow-up. Results. Off-pump CABG was associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate (0.3% vs 4.2%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.09 [95% confidence interval (CI):0.01 to 0.70] p = 0.021) than on-pump CABG. Results coincided with a lower rate of postoperative neurologic complications in patients undergoing off-pump CABG (1.7% vs 5.4%; adjusted OR = 0.31 [95% CI: 0.12 to 0.77] p = 0.012) and a less frequent need for hemofiltration in these patients (3.4% vs 10.4%; adjusted OR = 0.30 [95% CI: 0.14 to 0.64] p = 0.002). The off-pump technique decreased the 6-month mortality rate (2.3% vs 8.8%; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.27 [95% CI: 0.12 to 0.61] p = 0.002) and also the 1-year mortality rate (4.0% vs 10.6%; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.40 [95% CI: 0.22 to 0.75] p = 0.004) significantly. Conclusions. Our data indicate that in terms of postoperative complications and early and mid-term survival, off-pump CABG is superior to the on-pump technique in diabetic patients. (C) 2013 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据