4.7 Article

Carbon sequestration potential estimates with changes in land use and tillage practice in Ohio, USA

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 111, 期 1-4, 页码 140-152

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.05.012

关键词

alfisols; carbon sequestration; carbon sequestration potential; conventional tillage; cropland; forestland; no-till; reforestation; soil organic carbon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil C sequestration through changes in land use and management is one of the important strategies to mitigate the global greenhouse effect. This study was conducted to estimate C sequestration potential of the top 20 cm depth of soil for two scenarios in Ohio, USA: (1) with reforestation of both current cropland and grassland where SOC pools are less than the baseline SOC pool under current forest; (2) with the adoption of NT on all current cropland. Based on Ohio Soil Survey Characterization Database and long-term experimental data of paired conservation tillage (CT) versus no-till (NT), we specified spatial variations of current SOC pools and C sequestration potentials associated with soil taxa within each major land resource area (MLRA). For scenario 1, there would be 4.56 Mha of cropland having an average SOC sequestration capacity of 1.55 kg C m(-2) and 0.80 Mha of grassland with that of 1.35 kg C m(-2). Of all potential area, 73% are associated with Alfisols and 15% with Mollisols, but the achievable potential could vary significantly with individual MLRAs. Alternately, an average SOC sequestration rate of 62 g C m(-2) year(-1) was estimated with conversion from CT to NT for cultivated Alfisols, by which a cumulative increase of 71 Tg C resulted from reforestation of cropland could be realized in 25 years. Soils with lower antecedent C contents have higher C sequestration rates. In comparison with the results obtained at the state scale, the estimates of SOC sequestration potentials taxonomically associated with each specific MLRA may be more useful to the formulation of C credit trading programs. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据