4.3 Article

Reactive oxygen species production by mitochondria in endothelial cells exposed to reoxygenation after hypoxia and glucose depletion is mediated by ceramide

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00480.2004

关键词

H2O2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In endothelium, reoxygenation after hypoxia (H/R) has been shown to induce production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by complex III of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The purpose of the present study was to test the involvement of ceramide in this phenomenon. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells underwent 2 h of hypoxia ( PO2, similar to 20 mmHg) without glucose and 1 h of reoxygenation (PO2, similar to 120 mmHg) with glucose. ROS production was measured by the fluorescent marker 2', 7' -dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate, and cell death by propidium iodide. We showed that 1) after 1 h of reoxygenation, fluorescence had risen and that ROS production was inhibited by desipramine, an inhibitor of sphingomyelinase, an enzyme responsible for ceramide production ( 126 +/- 7% vs. 48 +/- 12%, P < 0.05); 2) administration of ceramide (N- acetylsphingosine) per se (i.e., in the absence of H/R) induced ROS production (65 +/- 3%), which was inhibited by complex III inhibitor: antimycin A (24 +/- 3%, P < 0.0001), or stigmatellin (31 +/- 2%, P < 0.0001); 3) hypoxia/reoxygenationinduced ROS production was not affected by either ceramide-activated protein kinase inhibitor dimethyl aminopurine or mitochondrial permeability transition inhibitor cyclosporin A but was significantly inhibited by the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 (82 +/- 8%, P < 0.05); 4) ceramide-induced ROS production was also inhibited by Bcl-2 ( 41 +/- 4%, P < 0.0001). These results demonstrate that in endothelial cells submitted to hypoxia and glucose depletion followed by reoxygenation with glucose, the pathway implicated in mitochondrial complex III ROS production is ceramide dependent and is decreased by the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据