4.7 Article

A novel inhibitor of oxidosqualene: Lanosterol cyclase inhibits very low-density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB100) production and enhances low-density lipoprotein ApoB100 catabolism through marked reduction in hepatic cholesterol content

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000189158.28455.94

关键词

oxidosqualene : lanosterol cyclase; apoB kinetics; LDL receptor; ABCG5; ABCG8

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-12609] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective - Inhibition of 2,3-oxidosqualene: lanosterol cyclase (OSC), an enzyme in the cholesterol synthesis pathway, has the unique ability to inhibit cholesterol synthesis while simultaneously enhancing oxysterol synthesis. Our objectives were to determine, in vivo, if a novel OSC inhibitor reduced low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and to define the mechanism(s) involved. Methods and Results - Miniature pigs received the OSC inhibitor RO0717625 or placebo and a diet containing fat (34% of energy) and 400 mg per day of cholesterol. Treatment decreased plasma total cholesterol (-20%)and LDL cholesterol (-29%). Apolipoprotein B (apoB) kinetic parameters were determined. Very low - density lipoprotein (VLDL) apoB pool size decreased 22% because of inhibition of VLDL production (-43%). LDL apoB pool size decreased 22% because of a 1.5-fold increase in fractional catabolic rate (FCR). The increased FCR was associated with a 2-fold increase in hepatic LDL receptor mRNA. Hepatic total and microsomal cholesterol were reduced by 16% and 27%, respectively. Plasma lathosterol concentrations decreased 57%, reflecting inhibition of hepatic cholesterol synthesis. Treatment reduced plasma plant sterols and decreased postprandial cholesterol transport in chylomicrons. Conclusions - A novel OSC inhibitor, RO0717625, decreased VLDL and LDL apoB100 through decreased VLDL production and enhanced LDL clearance. Thus, OSC represents a potential therapeutic target for dyslipidemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据