4.0 Article

Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2I

期刊

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
卷 62, 期 12, 页码 1894-1899

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.62.12.1894

关键词

-

资金

  1. Telethon [GP0227Y01, GTF02009] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 21 is caused by mutations in the fukutin-related protein gene (FKRP). FKRP encodes a putative glycosyltransferase protein that is involved in a-dystroglycan glycosylation. Objectives: To identify patients with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 21 and to derive genotype-phenotype correlations. Design: Two hundred fourteen patients who showed muscle histopathologic features consistent with muscular dystrophy or myopathy of unknown etiology were studied. The entire 1.5-kilobase FKRP coding sequence from patient DNA was analyzed using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography of overlapping polymerase chain reaction products, followed by direct sequencing of heteroduplexes. Results: Thirteen patients with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 21 (6% of all patients tested) were identified by FKRP mutation analysis, and 7 additional patients were identified by family screening. Six missense mutations (1 novel) were identified. The 826C>A nucleotide change was a common mutation, present in 35% of the mutated chromosomes. Clinical presentations included asymptomatic hyperCKemia, severe early-onset muscular dystrophy, and mild late-onset muscular dystrophy. Dilated cardiomyopathy and ventilatory impairment were frequent features. Significant intrafamilial and interfamilial clinical variability was observed. Conclusions: FKRP mutations are a frequent cause of limb-girdle muscular dystrophies. The degree of respiratory and cardiac insufficiency in patients did not correlate with the severity of muscle involvement. The finding of 2 asymptomatic patients with FKRP mutations suggests that modulating factors may ameliorate the clinical phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据