4.6 Article

A common dimerization interface in bacterial response regulators KdpE and TorR

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 3077-3088

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1110/ps.051722805

关键词

phosphorylation; transcription regulation; response regulator; TMAO respiratory system; Kdp K+ transport system

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R37GM047958, T32GM08319, T32 GM008319, F31 GM070142, 5F31GM070142, R37 GM047958] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial response regulators are key regulatory proteins that function as the final elements of so-called two-component signaling systems. The activities of response regulators in vivo are modulated by phosphorylation that results from interactions between the response regulator and its cognate histidine protein kinase. The level of response regulator phosphorylation, which is regulated by intra-or extracellular signals sensed by the histidine protein kinase, ultimately determines the output response that is initiated or carried out by the response regulator. We have recently hypothesized that in the OmpR/PhoB subfamily of response regulator transcription factors, this activation involves a common mechanism of dimerization using a set of highly conserved residues in the alpha 4-beta 5-alpha 5 face. Here we report the X-ray crystal structures of the regulatory domains of response regulators TorR (1.8 angstrom), Ca2+-bound KdpE (2.0 angstrom), and Mg2+/BeF3--bound KdpE (2.2 angstrom), both members of the OmpR/ PhoB subfamily from Escherichia coli. Both regulatory domains form symmetric dimers in the asymmetric unit that involve the alpha 4-beta 5-alpha 5 face. As observed previously in other OmpR/PhoB response regulators, the dimer interfaces are mediated by highly conserved residues within this subfamily. These results provide further evidence that most all response regulators of the OmpR/ PhoB subfamily share a common mechanism of activation by dimerization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据