4.7 Article

Pattern of variables describing desaturator COPD patients, as revealed by cluster analysis

期刊

CHEST
卷 128, 期 6, 页码 3828-3837

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.6.3828

关键词

arterial oxygen saturation; cluster analysis; COPD; hy oxemia; pulmonary hypertension; sleep-related hypoxemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study objectives: The aims of this study were to define, by cluster analysis, a pattern of clinical variables that differentiate desaturator (D) from nondesaturator (ND) patients affected by COPD, and to identify daytime variables that are predictive of nocturnal desaturation. Patients: Fifty-one random, consecutive COPD outpatients (20 women; mean [+/- SD] age, 69.6 +/- 4.0 years) with mild daytime hypoxemia (PaO2, 60 to 70 mm Hg) were enrolled into the study. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients were excluded. Measurements and results: Lung volumes, arterial blood gas levels, and mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) were measured, and nocturnal desaturation was evaluated with nighttime polygraphy. With least squares simple linear regression, the percentage of total recording time was highly correlated with a total nocturnal recording time of arterial oxygen saturation of < 90 mm Hg (T-90) and MPAP (R = 0.84; R-2 = 71.20%); T-90 was also highly correlated with daytime Paco(2) (R = 0.70; R-2 = 48.96%). Multiple regression showed that T,, was highly correlated with both MPAP and Paco(2) (R-2 = 97.75%). Hierarchical cluster analysis conducted with these three variables showed that D and ND patients differed in both nocturnal and daytime variables. The mean T-90 was 30 +/- 3.5% in 19.2% and 8%, respectively, of the D and ND groups. Moreover, two D subgroups differing in MPAP and two ND subgroups differing in Paco(2) were identified. Conclusions: D patients may be identified by a pattern of T90, MPAP, and Paco(2) values, rather than by T-90 alone, with the latter two variables being predictors of nocturnal desaturation severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据