4.2 Article

The influence of hurricane winds on Caribbean dry forest structure and nutrient pools

期刊

BIOTROPICA
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 571-583

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00074.x

关键词

Caribbean; disturbance; forest structure; hurricane; litterfall; mortality; nutrients; Puerto Rico; subtropical dry forest; wind

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 1998, we measured the effects of Hurricane Georges after it passed over long-term research sites in Puerto Rican dry forest. Our primary objectives were to quantify hurricane effects oil forest structure, to compare effects in a large tract of forest versus a series of nearby forest fragments, to evaluate short-term response 10 hurricane disturbance in terms of mortality and sprouting, and to assess the ability of hurricanes to maintain forest structure. We sampled damage from 33 plot's (1.3 ha) across a 3000-ha tract of forest as well as in 19 fragments. For steins with 2.5-cm minimum diameter, 1004 sterns/ha (12.4%) suffered Structural damage, while 69 percent of the undamaged steins were at least 50 percent defoliated. Basal area lost 10 Structural damage equaled 4.0 m(2)/ha (22%) in south-facing native forests. Structural damage and defoliation increased with stern diameter and were more common in certain dry forest species. South-Facing forests and those on ridgetops incurred more damage than north-facing forests or chose comprised primarily of introduced species. Stein mortatity was only 2 percent of all steins after 9 me. Structural damage did not necessarily result in stern mortality Hurricane-induced mortality was not associated with stem height or diameter, but was ten times greater than background mortality. Basal sprouting was proportional to the amount of structural damage incurred in a stand. Forest fragments experienced the same patterns of hurricane effects as the reference forest. The low, dense structure of Caribbean dry forest can be maintained by hurricane damage to larger steins and induction of basal sprouting to generate multistemmed trees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据