3.9 Article

Invertivory by northern pike (Esox lucius) structures communities of littoral macroinvertebrates in small boreal lakes

期刊

出版社

NORTH AMER BENTHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1899/04-128.1

关键词

disturbance; whole lake; mesocosm; predation; Erpobdellidae; Gammarus; Alberta; principal components analysis; randomized intervention analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent comparative studies suggest that macroinvertebrates in small Boreal Plains lakes respond to large fluctuations in fish densities caused by winterkill and subsequent recovery even when such fluctuations involve the normally piscivorous northern pike (Esox lucius). We introduced pike into a boreal lake made fishless by a past winterkill to isolate experimentally the effects of pike on littoral macroinvertebrates. We compared postmanipulation macroinvertebrate data from the experimental lake (EXP) to premanipulation data from the same lake, to parallel data from 2 unmanipulated reference lakes (R1 and R2) containing pike, and to data from mesocosms within EXP Pike in all 3 lakes preyed heavily upon macroinvertebrates; diets consisted predominantly of the amphipod Gammarus lacustris in R1 and R2 and erpobdellid leeches in EXP Principal components analysis (PCA) of macroinvertebrate communities distinguished between systems with and without fish and detected a shift in the macroinvertebrate community of EXP and predator-exposed control mesocosms away from large conspicuous taxa (e.g., odonates, coleopterans, and leeches) toward less-conspicuous taxa such as dipterans and trichopterans following manipulation. Responses of individual taxa were generally in agreement with PCA; erpobdellid leeches and odonates showed consistent negative responses to pike. Our study provides experimental evidence at the whole-lake scale that northern pike can affect littoral macroinvertebrates in small boreal lakes, and demonstrates the sensitivity that littoral food webs in these systems can have to changes in the density of fish.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据