4.7 Article

Adenosine kinase inhibitors.: 6.: Synthesis, water solubility, and antinociceptive activity of 5-phenyl-7-(5-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranosyl)pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidines substituted at C4 with glycinamides and related compounds

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 24, 页码 7808-7820

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jm050394a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

4-(Phenylamino)-5-phenyl-7-(5-deoxy-beta-D-ribofuranosyl)pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine (1) and related compounds known as diaryltubercidin analogues are potent inhibitors of adenosine kinase (AK) and are orally active in animal models of pain such as the rat formalin paw model (GP3269 ED50 = 6.4 mg/kg). However, the utility of this compound class is limited by poor water solubility that can be attributed to the high energy of crystallization caused by stacking of the parallel C4 and C5 aryl rings in the solid state (compound 1 and GP3269 each with pH 7.4 solubility < 0.05 mu g/mL). To increase water solubility, the hydrophobic C4-phenylamino substituent was replaced with a more hydrophilic group, glycinamide. This modification resulted in improved water solubility while retaining AK inhibition potency. Analogues were studied where changes in the glycinamide moiety were combined with changes to the base and sugar. A lead compound, 4-N-(N-cyclopropylcarbamoylmethyl)amino-5-phenyl-7-(5-deoxy-p-D-ribofuranosyl)pyrrolo[2,3-dipyrimidine (16c) (IC50 = 3 nM and water solubility = 32 9,mu g/mL at pH 7.4), was further characterized in biological assays. Compound 16c exhibited strong oral efficacy in the rat formalin paw model (ED50 of 2.5 mg/kg). In the most advanced assay, 16c was found to inhibit bradykinin-induced licking in marmoset monkeys with an ED50 estimated at 0.9 mg/kg without producing evidence of side effects such as ataxia, sedation, and emesis at this dose. However, lethal toxicity in the rat formalin paw model occurred with high doses of 16c, and further work on this series was discontinued.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据