4.5 Article

The facial motor nucleus transcriptional program in response to peripheral nerve injury identifies Hn1 as a regeneration-associated gene

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 82, 期 5, 页码 581-591

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.20676

关键词

axotomy; RAGs; microarray; Hn1; motoneuron

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS34901] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Facial nerve axotomy (FNA) is a well-established experimental model of motoneuron regeneration. After peripheral nerve axotomy, a sequence of events including glial activation and axonal regrowth leads to functional recovery of the afflicted pool of motoneurons. Using microarray analysis we identified an increase in the expression of 60 genes (at a false discovery rate of 0.1, genes were significant P < 0.004) within the facial nucleus as a consequence of nerve injury. In situ hybridization analysis validated the increased expression of many of these axotomy-induced genes. One specific gene, encoding a unique primary amino acid sequence, termed hemopoietic- and neurologic-expressed sequence-1 (Hn1), was evaluated more extensively using several additional nerve injury paradigms. Hn1 mRNA was upregulated in injured facial motoneurons in both rats and mice. Sustained upregulation of Hn1 mRNA was evident after nerve resection whereas levels of Hn1 mRNA returned to baseline in animals subjected to nerve crush or nerve transection. Hn1 was also increased in the dorsal motor nucleus and the nucleus ambiguous after vagus nerve axotomy, another regeneration model. No upregulation of Hn1 expression was observed, however, in two nonregeneration models: FNA in newborn rats and rubrospinal tractotomy. Hn1 mRNA was ubiquitous in the developing central nervous system whereas its expression in adult brain was confined to neurons of the hippocampus, cortex and cerebellum. These findings identify Hn1 as a gene associated with nervous system development and nerve regeneration. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据