4.1 Article

Accumulation of lipid peroxidation-derived DNA lesions: Potential lead markers for chemoprevention of inflammation-driven malignancies

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.04.013

关键词

lipid peroxidation; 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal; etheno-DNA adducts; chronic inflammation; impaired DNA-repair; human cancer chemoprevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic inflammatory processes produce an excess of ROS and DNA-reactive aldehydes from lipid peroxidation (LPO), such as trans-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) and malondialdehyde (MDA). which can modify cellular macromolecules and drive to malignancy. Etheno-modified DNA bases are generated inter alia by reaction of DNA with the major LPO product. HNE. We are investigating steady-state levels of etheno-DNA adducts in organs with diseases related to persistent inflammatory processes that can lead to malignancies. We have developed ultrasensitive and specific methods for the detection of etheno-DNA base adducts in human tissues and in urine. Etheno-DNA adduct levels were found to be significantly elevated in the affected organs of subjects with chronic pancreatitis, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. When patients with alcohol abuse-related hepatitis, fatty liver, fibrosis and cirrhosis were compared with asymptomatic livers. excess hepatic DNA damage was seen in the three latter patient groups. Etheno-deoxyadenosine excreted in urine was measured in HBV-infected. patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. As compared to controls, these patients had Lip to 90-fold increased urinary levels. Impaired or imbalanced DNA-repair pathways may influence the steady-state levels of etheno-DNA adducts in inflamed tissues. In conclusion, etheno-DNA adducts may serve as potential lead markers for assessing progression of inflammatory cancer-prone diseases. If so, the efficacy of human chemopreventive interventions for malignant disease prevention could be verified. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据