4.6 Article

Yersinia outer protein P suppresses TGF-β-activated kinase-1 activity to impair innate immune signaling in Yersinia enterocolitica-infected cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 175, 期 12, 页码 8209-8217

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.8209

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pathogenic Yersinia spp. use a panel of virulence proteins that antagonize signal transduction processes in infected cells to undermine host defense mechanisms. One of these proteins, Yersinia enterocolitica outer protein P (YopP), down-regulates the NF-kappa B and MAPK signaling pathways, which suppresses the proinflammatory host immune response. In this study, we explored the mechanism by which YopP succeeds to simultaneously disrupt several of these key signaling pathways of innate immunity. Our data show that YopP operates upstream of its characterized eukaryotic binding partner I kappa B kinase-beta to shut down the NF-kappa B signaling cascade. Accordingly, YopP efficiently impaired the activities of TGF-beta-activated kinase-1 (TAK1) in infected cells. TAK1 is an important activator of the I kappa B kinase complex in the TLR signaling cascade. The repression of TAK1 activities correlated with reduced activation of NF-kappa B- as well as AP-1-dependent reporter gene expression in Yersinia-infected murine macrophages. This suggests that the impairment of the TAK1 enzymatic activities by Yersinia critically contributes to downregulate activation of NF-kappa B and or MAPK members in infected host cells. The inhibition of TAK1 potentially results from the blockade of signaling events that control TAK1 induction. This process could involve the attenuation of ubiquitination of the upstream signal transmitter TNFR-associated factor-6. Together, these results indicate that, by silencing the TAK1 signaling complex, Yersinia counteracts the induction of several conserved signaling pathways of innate immunity,,which aids the bacterium in subverting the host immune response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据