4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Peripheral cholinergic disturbances in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 233-238

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2005.10.034

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; acetylcholinesterase; butyrylcholinesterase; molecular forms; apolipoprotein E; butyrylcholinesterase K variant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most pronounced neurochemical abnormality in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is cholinergic dysfunction in the central nervous system. Peripheral tissues may also be affected, however, including blood. The present study undertook to determine the activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and its molecular forms in erythrocytes, lymphocytes and platelets of normal elderly subjects and probable AD cases. These samples contained dimeric globular (G2), tetrameric globular (G4) and asymmetric (A12) AChE forms, but no globular monomeric (G1) enzyme. In both lymphocytes and platelets, the major AChE molecular form was G2 (approximately 80%), with G4 and A12 forms accounting for nearly equal portions of the remainder. Total AChE activities and measured sedimentation coefficients were similar in the control and AD samples (from patients with mild and moderately severe cognitive deficiency). However, the groups differed significantly in the proportion of certain AChE molecular forms. Thus, as compared with controls, the amount of A 12 AChE in the AD samples was increased 148 and 161% in lymphocytes and platelets, respectively. Genotyping for apolipoprotein E (ApoE) and the butyrylcholinesterase K (BCHE-K) variant, carried out using the polymerase chain reaction, showed that AD patients carried the ApoE4 allele at a significantly higher frequency than the controls. On the other hand there were no significant group differences in the occurrence of the BCHE-K variant and no synergism between ApoE alleles and the BCHE-K variant in our Hungarian AD population. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据