4.6 Article

Effects of six months losartan administration on liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients: A pilot study

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 11, 期 48, 页码 7560-7563

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i48.7560

关键词

Hepatitis C; Liver fibrosis; Losartan; AT1R; Chronic liver disease; Angiotensin II

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of chronic administration of losartan on hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients. METHODS: Fourteen patients with chronic hepatitis C non-responders (n = 10), with contraindications (n = 2) or lack of compliance (n = 2) to interferon plus ribavirin therapy and liver fibrosis were enrolled. Liver and renal function test, clinical evaluation, and liver biopsies were performed at baseline and after losartan administration at a dose of 50 mg/d during the 6 mo. The control group composed of nine patients with the same inclusion criteria and paired liver biopsies (interval 6-14 mo). Histological activity index (HAI) with fi brosis stage was assessed under blind conditions by means of Ishak's score. Subendothelial fibrosis was evaluated by digital image analyses. RESULTS: The changes in the fibrosis stage were significantly different between losartan group (decrease of 0.5 +/- 1.3) and controls (increase of 0.89 +/- 1.27; P < 0.03). In the treated patients, a decrease in fi brosis stage was observed in 7/14 patients vs 1/9 control patients (P < 0.04). A decrease in sub-endothelial fi brosis was observed in the losartan group. No differences were found in HAI after losartan administration. Acute and chronic decreases in systolic arterial pressures (P < 0.05) were observed after the losartan administration, without changes in mean arterial pressure or renal function. CONCLUSION: Chronic AT-II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockade may reduce liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. (C) 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据