4.7 Article

NMDA receptor antagonists antagonize the facilitatory effects of post-training intra-basolateral arnygdala NMDA and physostigmine on passive avoidance learning

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 529, 期 1-3, 页码 122-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.10.034

关键词

NMDA; DL-AP5; MK-801; physostigmine; passive avoidance learning; retention; basolateral amygdala; (rats)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, the effects of post-training intra-basolateral amygdala (BLA) injection of an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonist and competitive or noncompetitive antagonists, on memory retention of passive avoidance learning was measured in the presence and absence of physostigmine in rats. Intra-BLA administration of lower doses of NMDA (10(-5) and 10(-4) mu g/rat) did not affect memory retention, although higher doses of the drug (10(-3), 10(-2) and 10(-1) mu g/rat) increased memory retention. The greatest response was obtained with 10(-1) mu g/rat of the drug. The different doses of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist DL-AP5 (1, 3.2 and 10 mu g/rat) and noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (0.5, 1 and 2 mu g/rat) decreased memory retention in rats dose dependently. Both competitive and noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists reduced the effect of NMDA (10(-2) mu g/rat). In another series of experiments, intra-BLA injection of physostigmine (2, 3 and 4 mu g/rat) improved memory retention. Post-training co-administration of lower doses of NMDA (10(-5) and 10(-4) mu g/rat) and physostigmine (1 mu g/ rat), doses which were ineffective when given alone, significantly improved the retention latency. The competitive and noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists, DL-AP5 and MK-801, decreased the effect of physostigmine (2 mu g/rat). Atropine decreased memory retention by itself and potentiated the response to DL-AP5 and MK-801. It may be concluded that amygdalar NMDA receptor mechanisms interact with cholinergic systems in the modulation of memory. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据