4.7 Article

Mechanochemical preparation and investigation of properties of magnesium, calcium and lithium-magnesium alanates

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 407, 期 1-2, 页码 78-86

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.06.069

关键词

alanates; decomposition; DSC; hydrogen storage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ball milling of MgCl2 and CaCl2 with NaAlH4 or LiAlH4 can be used for the preparation of magnesium, calcium and lithium-magnesium alanates in mixture with NaCl or LiCl. Using wet chemical separation methods, it was possible to obtain these alanates in nearly pure state. The alanates were characterized by X-ray diffractometry, solid-state Al-27 NMR and IR spectroscopy and thermovolumetric (TV) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements. Mg(AlH4)(2) dissociates thermally in one step to MgH2, Al and hydrogen; at a higher temperature, MgH2 and Al transform to Mg-Al alloy and hydrogen. Thermal dissociations of Ca(AlH4)(2) and of LiMg(AlH4)(3) (in mixture with NaCl or LiCl) proceeds in several steps, of which the first two can be assigned to the formation of CaH2 and of a MgH2/LiH mixture, respectively, in addition to Al and H-2. Possible intermediates of these two steps are CaAlH5 and LiMgAlH6. Higher temperature dissociations include formation of MgH2 (LiH) and Ca-Al alloys from CaH2, CaH2 and Al, respectively. Upon ball milling of MgCl2 or CaCl2 with NaAlH4 or LiAlH4 in the presence of Ti catalysts, only the thermal dissociation products of the expected alanates are obtained. This indicates that dehydrogenation discharge of earth alkali metal alanates can be catalyzed by Ti. According to DSC measurements, the thermodynamic stability of Mg(AlH4)(2) (Delta H = 1.7 kJ/mol) is too low for the purpose of reversible hydrogen storage. Determination of Delta H values for the second, endothermal step of calcium and lithium-magnesium alanate dissociations gave values of around 31.6 and 13.1 kJ/mol, respectively. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据