4.8 Article

Phase coexistence and connectivity in the apical membrane of polarized epithelial cells

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509885103

关键词

fluorescence recovery after photobleaching; rafts; paurdan; liquid-ordered; Madin-Darby-canine kidney

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although it is well described in model membranes, little is known about phase separation in biological membranes. Here, we provide evidence for a coexistence of at least two different lipid bilayer phases in the apical plasma membrane of epithelial cells. Phase connectivity was assessed by measuring long-range diffusion of several membrane proteins by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in two polarized epithelial cell lines and one fibroblast cell line. In contrast to the fibroblast plasma membrane, in which all of the proteins diffused with similar characteristics, in the apical membrane of epithelial cells the proteins could be divided into two groups according to their diffusion characteristics. At room temperature (approximate to 25 degrees C), one group showed fast diffusion and complete recovery. The other diffused three to four times slower and, more importantly, displayed only partial recovery. Only the first group comprises proteins that are believed to be associated with lipid rafts. The partial recovery is not caused by topological constraints (microvilli, etc.), cytoskeletal constraints, or protein-protein interactions, because all proteins show 100% recovery in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments at 37 degrees C. In addition, the raft-associated proteins cannot be coclustered by antibodies on the apical membrane at 12 degrees C. The interpretation that best fits these data is that the apical membrane of epithelial cells is a phase-separated system with a continuous (percolating) raft phase < 25 degrees C in which isolated domains of the nonraft phase are dispersed, whereas at 37 degrees C the nonraft phase becomes the continuous phase with isolated domains of the raft phase dispersed in it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据