4.6 Article

Novel polymer monolith microextraction using a poly(methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) monolith and its application to simultaneous analysis of several angiotensin II receptor antagonists in human urine by capillary zone electrophoresis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1102, 期 1-2, 页码 294-301

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.10.057

关键词

polymer monolith microextraction; poly(methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate); monolithic capillary; capillary zone electrophoresis; angintensin II receptor antagonists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel polymer monolith microextraction (PMME) using a poly(methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) (poly(MAA-EGDMA)) monolith in conjunction with capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) was developed for the determination of several angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARA-IIs) in human urine. The extraction device consisted of a regular plastic syringe (1 mL), a poly(MAA-EGDMA) monolithic capillary (2 cm x 530 mu m I.D.) and a plastic pinhead connecting the former two components seamlessly. The extraction was achieved by driving the sample solution through the monolithic capillary tube using a syringe infusion pump, and for the desorption step, an aliquot of organic solvent was injected via the monolithic capillary and collected into a vial for subsequent analysis by CZE. The best separation was realized at 25 kV using a buffer that consisted of 50% acetonitrile and 50%, buffer solution (v/v) containing 10 mM disodium hydrogenphosphate (adjusted to pH 2.3 with 1 M hydrochloric acid). The method was successfully applied to the determination of telmisartan (T), irbesartan (I) and losartan (L) in urine samples with candesartan (C) as internal standard, yielding the detection limit of 15-20 ng/mL. Close correlation coefficients (R > 0.999) and excellent method reproducibility were obtained for all the analytes over a linear range of 0.08-3 mu g/mL. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据