4.6 Article

Fibrinogen substrate recognition by Staphylocoagulase•(pro) thrombin complexes

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 2, 页码 1179-1187

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M507956200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thrombin generation and fibrinogen (Fbg) clotting are the ultimate proteolytic reactions in the blood coagulation pathway. Staphylocoagulase (SC), a protein secreted by the human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, activates prothrombin (ProT) without proteolysis. The SC.(pro) thrombin complex recognizes Fbg as a specific substrate, converting it directly into fibrin. The crystal structure of a fully active SC fragment containing residues 1-325 (SC-(1-325)) bound to human prethrombin 2 showed previously that SC inserts its Ile(1)-Val(2) N terminus into the Ile(16) pocket of prethrombin 2, inducing a functional active site in the cognate zymogen conformationally. Exosite I of alpha-thrombin, the Fbg recognition site, and pro-exosite I on ProT are blocked by domain 2 of SC-(1-325). In the present studies, active site-labeled fluorescent ProT analogs were used to quantitate Fbg binding to the SC-(1-325)(.)ProT complex. Fbg binding and cleavage are mediated by expression of a new Fbg-binding exosite on the SC-(1-325)(.)ProT complex, resulting in formation of an (SC-(1-325)(.)ProT)(2)(.)Fbg pentameric complex with a dissociation constant of 8-34 nM. In both crystal structures, the SC-(1-325)(.)(pre) thrombin complexes form dimers, with both proteinases/zymogens facing each other over a large U-shaped cleft, through which the Fbg substrate could thread. On this basis, a molecular model of the pentameric (SC-(1-325)(.)thrombin)(2)(.)Fbg encounter complex was generated, which explains the coagulant properties and efficient Fbg conversion. The results provide new insight into the mechanism that mediates high affinity Fbg binding and cleavage as a substrate of SC.(pro) thrombin complexes, a process that is central to the molecular pathology of S. aureus endocarditis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据