3.9 Article

Apelin: A new plasma marker of cardiopulmonary disease

期刊

REGULATORY PEPTIDES
卷 133, 期 1-3, 页码 134-138

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.regpep.2005.09.032

关键词

apelin; BNP; dyspnea; heart failure; proBNP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Dyspnea is a major symptom of both parenchymal lung disease and chronic heart failure. Underlying cardiac dysfunction can be assessed by measurement of cardiac-derived B-type natriuretic peptide or its precursor in plasma. However, no specific endocrine marker of the lung parenchyma has so far been identified. We therefore examined whether plasma concentrations of apelin, a novel inotropic hormone, is affected in patients with chronic parenchymal lung disease without cardiac dysfunction. Methods and results: Patients with severe chronic parenchymal lung disease and normal cardiac function (n = 53), idiopathic pulmonary hypertension with increased right ventricular pressure (n = 10), and patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n = 22) were enrolled. Plasma apelin-36 and proBNP concentrations were measured with radioimmunoassays. While proBNP plasma concentrations were unaffected in chronic parenchymal lung disease patients compared to normal subjects, the apelin-36 concentration was reduced 3.3-fold (median 35 pmol/l (0162 pmol/l) vs. 117 pmol/l (55-232 pmol/l), P < 0.001). Moreover, the apelin-36 concentration was decreased in chronic heart failure patients (2.1-fold, P < 0.01) and in patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (4.0-fold, P < 0.001). In contrast, the proBNP concentration was highly increased in both chronic heart failure and idiopathic pulmonary hypertension patients. Conclusion: Plasma concentrations of apelin-36, a novel inotropic peptide, are decreased in patients with chronic parenchymal lung disease and preserved cardiac function. Combined measurement of apelin-36 and proBNP may be a new diagnostic approach in distinguishing pulmonary from cardiovascular causes of dyspnea. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据