4.7 Article

Cretaceous black shales as active bioreactors: A biogeochemical model for the deep biosphere encountered during ODP Leg 207 (Demerara Rise)

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 70, 期 2, 页码 408-425

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.09.010

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A transport-reaction model was designed to identify the combination and importance of biogeochemical processes operating in four sites drilled during ODP Leg 207 (Demerara Rise, Equatorial Atlantic). Almost 100 Ma after their deposition, deeply buried Cretaceous black shales still act as active bioreactors in great sediment depths and control the biogeochernical reaction network of the whole sediment column. According to a model calibrated at the four drill sites through inverse modeling techniques, methanogenesis could be identified as a key process that dominates not only organic matter degradation but also sulfate availability through the anaerobic oxidation of methane above the black shales. A complete depletion of sulfate within the black shale sequences promotes the remobilization of biogenic barium that reprecipitates as authigenic barite at the top of the sulfate depletion zone. Temporal dynamics of degradation processes caused continuous shifts of the barite precipitation zone during burial, thus inhibiting the formation of an authigenic barite front or causing the dissolution of earlier formed fronts, Major deviations of pore water sulfate profiles from a linear gradient coincide with depths of decelerated or accelerated transport caused by local porosity minima or maxima. Model-determined reaction rates are by far lower than those found in shallower sediments due to the low metabolic activities that are characteristic for the Deep Biosphere. But even after almost 100 Ma, changing organic matter quality still influences the degradation within the black shale sequences, as it is indicated by model results. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据