4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in the United States, 2001-2002

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 193, 期 2, 页码 172-179

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/499632

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of disease, particularly in colonized persons. Although methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection has become increasingly reported, population-based S. aureus and MRSA colonization estimates are lacking. Methods. Nasal samples for S. aureus culture and sociodemographic data were obtained from 9622 persons >= 1 year old as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001 - 2002. After screening for oxacillin susceptibility, MRSA and selected methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis clonal type, toxin genes (e.g., for Panton-Valentine leukocidin [PVL]), and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type I-IV genes. Results. For 2001 - 2002, national S. aureus and MRSA colonization prevalence estimates were 32.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.7%-34.1%) and 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.4%), respectively, and population estimates were 89.4 million persons (95% CI, 84.8-94.1 million persons) and 2.3 million persons ( 95% CI, 1.2-3.8 million persons), respectively. S. aureus colonization prevalence was highest in participants 6 - 11 years old. MRSA colonization was associated with age >= 60 years and being female but not with recent health-care exposure. In unweighted analyses, the SCCmec type IV gene was more frequent in isolates from participants of younger age and of non-Hispanic black race/ethnicity; the PVL gene was present in 9 (2.4%) of 372 of isolates tested. Conclusions. Many persons in the United States are colonized with S. aureus; prevalence rates differ demographically. MRSA colonization prevalence, although low nationally in 2001 - 2002, may vary with demographic and organism characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据