4.8 Article

A microsystem compatible strategy for viable Escherichia coli detection

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 1163-1170

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2005.04.015

关键词

viability detection; microsystem; Escherichia coli; magnetic particles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study delineates a microsystem compatible strategy that enables the rapid determination of Escherichia coli viability for the application in food and water monitoring. This approach differentiates the living cells from the dead ones by detecting the presence of a viability indicator, i.e. mRNAs of a common E coli GroEL heat shock protein (hsp). Our method starts with a stimulated and controlled transcription of hsp mRNA under an elevated temperature (47 degrees C) for 20 min. Following that, the short-life mRNA is rapidly extracted using streptavidin-modified magnetic particles containing biotin-labeled DNA probes complementary to a specific region of the mRNA. The quantification of mRNA by gel electrophoresis and Ag/Au-based electrochemical detection is done after the amplification of mRNAs by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Heat shock temperatures and durations that have profound effect to the mRNA transcription were studied and it was found that the mRNA undergoes a rapid minute-by-minute self-degradation after the environment resumes room temperature. Issues such as the DNA contamination that interfere the magnetic particle-based mRNA extraction technique were tackled. A sensitive Ag/Au-based electrochemical analysis method was used to detect the RT-PCR products and a cell concentration as low as 10(2) cfu/ml can be achieved by the electrochemical method, but not by the conventional gel electrophoresis. The strategy demonstrated in this study can be readily implemented in a microsystem and is a step forward for the realization of an integrated bioanalytical microsystem (lab on a chip) for the viable cell detection. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据