4.7 Article

Paleomagnetic evidence for a mid-miocene clockwise rotation of about 25° of the Guide Basin area in NE Tibet

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 241, 期 1-2, 页码 234-247

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.10.013

关键词

Tibet; neogene; rotations; paleomagnetism; guide basin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ten sections of Neogene molasse-type sediments were sampled in the Guide Basin of northeastern Tibet for magnetostratigraphy [X.M. Fang, M.D. Yan, R. Van der Voo, DR., Rea, C. Song, J.M. Pares, J. Gao, J. Nie, S. Dai, Late Cenozoic deformation and uplift of the NE Tibetan plateau: evidence from high resolution magnetostratigraphy of the Guide Basin, Qinghai Province, China, Geol. Soc. America Bull. 107 (2005) 1208-1225 [1]], but they also yield seven well-dated formation-mean directions that reveal changing declinations as rotations occurred in response to crustal deformation north of the India-Asia collision zone. Three formations are of early Miocene and Oligocene age, as indicated by fossils and magnetic reversal records, whereas four younger formations yield late Miocene and Pliocene ages. The dual-polarity magnetizations are typically antipodal, but reveal inclinations that are too shallow, most likely because of post-depositional inclination flattening. The late Miocene and younger directions show formation-mean declinations between 354 degrees and 7 degrees, whereas three early Miocene and late Oligocene mean declinations range from 31 degrees to 44 degrees. This indicates that a clockwise rotation of 25.1 +/- 4.6 degrees took place during the middle part of the Miocene (best estimate 11-17 Ma). No rotations appear to have occurred, during that time, in the Xining, Lanzhou, Linxia and Jingning basins (Longzhong Basin) to the northeast and east of the Guide Basin; however, a rotation of similar magnitude has been documented by Dupont-Nivet and colleagues for pre-Miocene (> 29 Ma) time in these areas. Collectively, these results show that the basins in NE Tibet have had independently evolving structural histories. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据