4.7 Article

MAP kinase phosphatase 1 controls innate immune responses and suppresses endotoxic shock

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 203, 期 1, 页码 131-140

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20051794

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL063067, HL063067] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI057798, AI045811, AI057798, R01 AI057798, R01 AI045811] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM044263, GM044263] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Septic shock is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. However, genetic factors predisposing to septic shock are not fully understood. Excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines, particularly tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and the resultant severe hypotension play a central role in the pathophysiological process. Mitogen-activated protein ( MAP) kinase cascades are crucial in the biosynthesis of proinflammatory cytokines. MAP kinase phosphatase (MKP)-1 is an archetypal member of the dual specificity protein phosphatase family that dephosphorylates MAP kinase. Thus, we hypothesize that knockout of the Mkp-1 gene results in prolonged MAP kinase activation, augmented cytokine production, and increased susceptibility to endotoxic shock. Here, we show that knockout of Mkp-1 substantially sensitizes mice to endotoxic shock induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge. We demonstrate that upon LPS challenge, Mkp-1(-/-) cells exhibit prolonged p38 and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activation as well as enhanced TNF-alpha and interleukin (IL)-6 production compared with wild-type cells. After LPS challenge, Mkp-1 knockout mice produce dramatically more TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-10 than do wild-type mice. Consequently, Mkp-1 knockout mice develop severe hypotension and multiple organ failure, and exhibit a remarkable increase in mortality. Our studies demonstrate that MKP-1 is a pivotal feedback control regulator of the innate immune responses and plays a critical role in suppressing endotoxin shock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据