4.8 Article

Electrocardiographic abnormalities that predict coronary heart disease events and mortality in postmenopausal women - The women's health initiative

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 113, 期 4, 页码 473-480

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.496091

关键词

cardiovascular diseases; electrocardiography; morbidity; mortality; women

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background - Information is limited about the independent prognostic value of repolarization abnormalities in women. Methods and Results - We evaluated hazard ratios for ECG variables for combined fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease (CHD) events and for CHD mortality using Cox regression in 38 283 Women's Health Initiative (WHI) participants during up to 9.2 years of follow-up. All risk models were adjusted for demographic, clinical, and therapeutic variables. Evaluated as single ECG variables, wide QRS/T angle and ECG-demonstrated myocardial infarction ( ECG-MI) were the strongest predictors of CHD events, with hazard ratios (95% CI) of 1.90 (1.50 to 2.42) and 1.62 (1.29 to 2.03), respectively. Six other repolarization variables were also significant, strong predictors of CHD events. Wide QRS/T angle, ECG-MI, and QT prolongation appeared as dominant predictors when evaluated simultaneously with other ECG variables in a multiadjusted risk model. QRS/T angle, ECG-MI, and high QRS nondipolar voltage were the strongest predictors of CHD mortality, with hazard ratios of 2.70, 2.41, and 2.18, respectively. The risk increase ranged from 63% to 95% for the other 4 significant predictors. Five ECG abnormalities were identified as dominant mortality risk predictors: wide QRS/T angle, ECG- MI, high QRS nondipolar voltage, reduced heart rate variability, and QT prolongation ( in the cardiovascular disease - free group only). Conclusions - Ventricular repolarization abnormalities in postmenopausal women are as important predictors of CHD events and CHD mortality as ECG- MI and other QRS abnormalities. Repolarization variables and QRS nondipolar voltage warrant attention in future investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据