4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Tensile and fatigue properties of the AA6061/20 vol.% Al2O3p and AA7005/10 vol.% Al2O3p composites

期刊

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 333-342

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.044

关键词

metal matrix composites; tensile tests; low-cycle fatigue; AA7005; AA6061; Al2O3; particles; high temperature; clustering; MgAl2O4 spinel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the tensile properties and the low-cycle fatigue behavior of the 7005 aluminum alloy reinforced with 10 vol% of Al2O3 particles (W7A10A composite) and 6061 aluminum alloy reinforced with 20 vol% of Al2O3 particles (W6A20A composite) were studied. The microstructural analyses showed clustering of Al2O3 particles, irregularly shaped and with a non-uniform size. A significant increase of the elastic modulus and tensile strength in the MMCs, respect to the unreinforced alloys, was evidenced by the tensile tests, while the elongation to fracture decreased. The temperature effect on the tensile properties was not relevant up to 150 degrees C, while strength significantly decreased at 250 degrees C, mainly in the composite with the lower content of the ceramic reinforcement. The low-cycle fatigue tests showed no evidence of isotropic hardening or softening for the W7A10A, and a slight cyclic softening for the W6A20A. SEM analyses of the fracture surfaces showed that both the tensile and fatigue fracture was controlled by interfacial decohesion (expecially for the W7A10A composite), fracture of reinforcing particles (mainly for the W6A20A composite), void nucleation and growth. Also the presence of the MgAl2O4 spinel, probably, played a significant role in the mechanisms of failure in the W6A20A composite, by promoting void nucleation at the particles-matrix interfaces, interfacial decohesion, and also failure of the particles. These effects can be responsible of the slight softening observed in the W6A20A, under the low-cycle fatigue conditions. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据