The influence of epiaortic ultrasonography on Intraoperative surgical management in 6051 cardiac surgical patients

Background. Intraoperative echocardiography has become a mainstay monitor of cardiac function and a popular diagnostic tool in patients undergoing cardiac procedures. Previous reports suggest that epiaortic ultrasonography (EU) is superior to transesophageal echocardiography and manual palpation in identifying ascending aortic atheroma. Its impact on surgical decision making has not been thoroughly investigated, however. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the medica l records of 6051 consecutive patients who underwent E U of their ascending aorta during cardiac operations between 1996 and 2006 to determine a potential impact on intraoperative surgical decision making. Aortic atheroma was graded according to standard classification. Neurologic complications were evaluated according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeon definition for stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Results. The overall impact of EU on surgical decision making was 4.1% and included a change in the technique for inducing cardiac arrest in 1.8%, aortic atherectomy or replacement surgery in 0.8%, requirement for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 0.6%, avoidance of aortic cross-clamping and use of ventricular fibrillatory arrest in 0.5%, change in arterial cannulation site in 0.2%, or avoidance of aortic cannulation in 0.2%. The greatest affect of EU was observed in patients undergoing combined CABG with aortic/mitral valve procedures (6.7%). The smallest impact was seen in patients undergoing mitral valve operations (1.4%). Aortic atheroma was more frequent on the anterior aspect of the aorta (n = 171) in patients with a change in surgical plan than on the posterior aspect (n = 78). The overall stroke rat e was lower in patients with intraoperative EU compared with all patients undergoing surgical procedures. Conclusions. Epiaortic ultrasonography is a useful technique to detect ascending aortic atheroma, has a significant impact on surgical decision making in more than 4% of cardiac surgical patients, and might result in improved perioperative neurologic outcome.