4.6 Article

Mucositis prevention by improved dental care in acute leukemia patients

期刊

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 137-146

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-005-0867-7

关键词

acute leukemia; oral complications; mucositis; prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Goals of work: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the intensive dental care protocol in preventing oral complications in acute leukemia patients. Patients and methods: Thirty-four patients hospitalized for induction remission therapy for acute leukemia were randomly assigned to one of two groups, whether to receive intensive dental care protocol or not. The intensive dental care group of patients received dental treatment and plaque and calculus removal prior to chemotherapy and supervised oral hygiene measures during chemotherapy. The limited dental care group of patients did not receive prechemotherapy dental care. Groups were comparable in age, sex, and antineoplastic treatment received. Patients were examined after admission to the hospital; at the initiation of the chemotherapy; and 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after initiation of therapy. Positive data about subjective difficulties were taken by anamnesis. Oral hygiene index (OHI) and gingival index (GI) were used to assess the periodontal status of the patients. The severity of mucositis was evaluated according to WHO classification. Main results: The results of this study pointed out lower mean values of GI and lower mean values of mucositis score in the intensive dental care group of patients during the whole period of examination. Although the differences in mean values were not statistically significant on most of the examination days, intensive dental care group of patients developed less severe and less painful oral complications compared to the limited dental care group of patients. Conclusions: We conclude that proper dental care and preventive measures both before and during chemotherapy can be beneficial to these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据