期刊
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 1-21出版社
PSYCHONOMIC SOC INC
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193807
关键词
-
资金
- NIMH NIH HHS [2-R01-MH52808, T32 MH019983, T32 MH019983-08, R01 MH052808, R01 MH052808-10] Funding Source: Medline
The majority of computationally specified models of recognition memory have been based on a single-process interpretation, claiming that familiarity is the only influence on recognition. There is increasing evidence that recognition is, in fact, based on two processes: recollection and familiarity. This article reviews the current state of the evidence for dual-process models, including the usefulness of the remember/know paradigm, and interprets the relevant results in terms of the source of activation confusion (SAC) model of memory. We argue that the evidence from each of the areas we discuss, when combined, presents a strong case that inclusion of a recollection process is necessary. Given this conclusion, we also argue that the dual-process claim that the recollection process is always available is, in fact, more parsimonious than the single-process claim that the recollection process is used only in certain paradigms. The value of a well-specified process model such as the SAC model is discussed with regard to other types of dual-process models.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据